Selection Guide For Radar, Guided Wave, Ultrasonic, And Capacitance Level Transmitters
Leave a message
This article explores:
✔ How radar, guided radar, ultrasonic, and capacitance level transmitters work
✔ Key advantages and limitations of each technology
✔ How to select the right level transmitter for your application
Radar Level Transmitters
The radar level sensors uses 23G/80G continuous wave radar with a maximum range of 70-200 meters and a maximum blind area of 0.2 meters. The continuous wave radar has a higher operating frequency, a larger bandwidth, and better accuracy and stability than traditional low-frequency radars. The radar module adopts FMCW mode and non-contact installation design, with a small size and compact structure. It has high accuracy, low power consumption, and strong anti-interference ability. It is suitable for water level monitoring in lakes and rivers, mountain torrent warnings, reservoirs, sewage pipe networks, etc.
Features of Radar Level Transmitters
✅ High accuracy (±0.5mm)
✅ Non-contact measurement (no wear & tear)
✅ Unaffected by density, dielectric, or conductivity changes
✅ Suitable for corrosive and high-temperature environments
Limitations
⚠ Foam or turbulent surfaces can disrupt signals
⚠ Blocking distance (minimum dead zone near the sensor)
⚠ Requires proper tank geometry for optimal performance
Guided Wave Radar Level Transmitters (TDR)
Guided wave radar level transmitter uses a probe to direct radar pulses along its length. When the pulse hits the medium, part of it reflects back.
Advantages of Guided Radar
✅ Higher accuracy (±0.2mm)
✅ Works with some foam layers
✅ Unaffected by dielectric changes
✅ Ideal for small tanks or interface measurement
Limitations
⚠ Heavy foam can still interfere
⚠ Probe must be chemically compatible with the medium
⚠ Blocking distance applies
Ultrasonic Level Transmitters
Ultrasonic level sensor (measures liquid level/material level) is a non-contact, highly reliable, cost-effective, easy to install and maintain liquid level/material level measuring instrument. It can meet most liquid level/material level measurement requirements without contacting the measured medium.
Advantages
✅ Lowest cost non-contact option
✅ No calibration needed for different liquids
✅ Unaffected by density or conductivity changes
Limitations
⚠ Foam, vapor, or dust can block signals
⚠ Not suitable for vacuum or high-pressure (>44 psia) applications
⚠ Affected by temperature variations
Capacitance Level Transmitters
These measure changes in capacitance between a probe and tank wall as the level changes.
Advantages
✅ Cost-effective solution
✅ Fast response time
✅ Works in high-pressure/high-temperature conditions
Limitations
⚠ Probe coating can affect accuracy
⚠ Requires recalibration for different media
⚠ Minimum dielectric constant required (10 pF span)
Conclusion: How to Choose the Right Level Transmitter
|
Factor |
Radar |
Guided wave |
Ultrasonic |
Capacitance |
|
Accuracy |
±0.5mm |
±0.2mm |
±3mm |
±1% FS |
|
Contact Type |
Non-contact |
Probe-based |
Non-contact |
Contact |
|
Foam |
Resistance |
Moderate |
Good |
Poor Moderate |
|
High Pressure/Temp |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
Cost |
High |
Medium-High |
Low |
Low-Medium |
Final Recommendation
- For corrosive liquids (e.g., sulfuric acid): 80GHz Radar (RD80G) for non-contact, high-accuracy measurement.
- For powders/solids: Guided Radar (TDR) for better foam penetration.
- For cost-sensitive applications: Ultrasonic (if no foam/vapor interference).
- For high-pressure tanks: Capacitance or Radar.
Installation methods for 26G/80G/guided wave radar level sensors, you can select the best level transmitter for reliable and accurate measurements from Ziasiot Sensor.

Need help choosing? Contact us for expert guidance on radar level sensor selection!









